var switchTo5x=true;
BREAKING NEWS

Assange: Any Teen Hacker Could Have Gotten Democrat Emails

Posted On 04 Jan 2017
By :
Comments: 156

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange told Fox News host Sean Hannity this week that his site did not get their trove of Democrat-penned emails from Russian authorities. In an interview that aired Tuesday, Assange said Democrats were so careless with their cybersecurity that any halfway competent teen hacker could have gotten into their emails.

“We published several emails which show Podesta responding to a phishing email,” Assange said. “Podesta gave out that his password was the word ‘password’. His own staff said this email that you’ve received, this is totally legitimate. So a 14-year-old kid could have hacked Podesta that way.”

Podesta’s password was “password”? Seriously? That actually explains a lot. If this is the kind of genius intellect that was behind the Hillary Clinton campaign, it’s a wonder she didn’t lose even more badly than she did. The re-animated corpse of Abraham Lincoln couldn’t win an election with these idiots in charge.

Assange said it was a mistake for Democrats to spend all of their time attacking WikiLeaks and Vladimir Putin while ignoring the content of the emails.

“It’s the same reason why they lost the election, which is instead of focusing on substance, they focused on other things like this attempt to say how outrageous it is that the American public received true information before an election,” Assange said. “The public doesn’t buy that. They want as much true information as possible.”

This is really the core of the problem. Whether or not Russia was behind the hacks, neither Podesta nor the DNC were able to seriously deny that the emails were genuine. So their messaging on Russia looked like a transparent attempt to draw attention away from the scandal.

On Wednesday morning, President-elect Donald Trump seized on the interview in a couple of early tweets.

“Julian Assange said ‘a 14 year old could have hacked Podesta’ – why was DNC so careless? Also said Russians did not give him the info!” Trump wrote.

In a follow-up, he wrote, “Somebody hacked the DNC but why did they not have ‘hacking defense’ like the RNC has and why have they not responded to the terrible things they did and said (like giving the questions to the debate to H). A total double standard! Media, as usual, gave them a pass.”

This has really been Trump’s point from the beginning. Okay, maybe Russia was behind the hacks. Fine. Bad Russia. Don’t do that!

But what did they really do? They released accurate information to the American public. As far as “swaying the election,” that was the extent of their interference. They didn’t hack the voting machines. They didn’t make up a bunch of false allegations. They simply released the truth.

At the end of the day, Democrats were undone by their own words and deeds.

What could be more democratic?

 


About the Author
  • gotabgood

    In other words… any common thief could have done the job..

    • supergun

      It takes a thief to expose a thief,,,,,if it means showing the e-mails.

    • Francisco Machado

      Given that common thieves are a subset of everyone, that conclusion is unavoidable since anyone could have hacked the emails of Hillary, Podesta and the DNC. Hillary might even have been sufficiently computer savvy to have hacked her own… No, I retract that. If she were that computer savvy she would know that anyone could have hacked hers.

  • gotabgood

    Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking
    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/10/21/17-intelligence-agencies-russia-behind-hacking/92514592/
    against one refugee… makes sense….. if you are a rightwinger where truth is a disease…

    • supergun

      Cuckoo,,,,,cuckoo,,,,,cuckoo.

    • GrizzMann

      They concluded what Obama told them, just as credible as like your doctor and insurance plan you can keep them, the Benghazi murders were the result of an evil video that revealed the life and times of Mohammad, etc..

      • gotabgood
        • GrizzMann

          I do remember when that came to a vote in the Senate. Oh! it didn’t. I do remember someone told the would be rescuers to stand down, those rascally GOP President Obama.

    • William Thompson

      You are sounding like a left wing nut.
      It’s the demoncrats that can’t handle the truth.

      • curmudgeon VN Veteran

        That’s because he is one. These left wingers are all batsh!t crazy. Give credit where credit is due.

      • GrizzMann

        Hard to do that in a world of make believe.

        • thereasonableman

          Which is where you and the Donald live.

          • GrizzMann

            I know 2+2 does really equal 5.

      • gotabgood

        You are proving my point… 17 “intelligence agencies” against one twitter… literally a twit that tweets!!

        And what is worse???????????????????????? You believe him!!

      • thereasonableman

        “Truth…you can’t handle the truth!”

    • Pete Dillon

      Even if it was a hack , they only exposed the truth, they didn’t write it. The scenario is tantamount to pulling the mask off a bank robber. It was embarrassing to find out your uncle robbed the bank but you didn’t make him plan and execute the robbery. The exposing of the data, didn’t invalidate it. Exposing the robber doesn’t mean he stole counterfeit money. You libtards are so stupid you don’t know how stupid you are.

      • rfrichey

        Very good analysis. Maybe some of the left brained morons can grasp the scenario better now that you explained it to them in a comic book way.

      • Arizona Don

        So true!

      • gotabgood

        First place RUSSIA hacked more than the DNC, the RNC was hacked too, but only the DNC was released through Wikileaks… sounds kinda fishy to me… maybe a Putin/Trump fling..
        but the point is a foreign government hacked into our elections and you are fine with that… as long as the out come was in your favor… suppose the hackers released documents of Trump breaking the Cuba embargo, enough to arrest him…. how would you feel then? It is still ok with Russia to hack into our system?? Thinking like that will cause us to be learning the Russian language soon.

    • river

      LOL…. GotaBstoopud here has escaped a liberal colon some place deep inside the confines of socialist fecal matter. Don’t pay any attention to him he’s just a wormy troll looking for a warm intestine to inhabit.

    • rfrichey

      So what? Whoever hacked exposed wrongdoing of the underhandedness that the crooked Hillary camp was up to. If they hadn’t been exposed, who knows, they may could have pulled enough of their crookedness to have defeated Trump. So, I guess in a way they can claim the wikileaks, regardless of who got them or how they were gotten did affect the election. Thank goodness!

      • gotabgood

        So according to you as long as the out come was to your liking,. it is ok that a foreign country hacks into our political elections?

        • Robert S. Allen

          Like for Obama to interfere in Israel’s elections?

          • Arizona Don

            We do have proof of that!

        • rfrichey

          I’ve yet to read where anyone hacked into our election. They only hacked into the DNC’s unsecured computers using the word password for the password, and by doing this they uncovered all of the shenanigans pulled on poor old Bernie whose was out there busting his a$$ while Hillary was sitting on hers thinking it was in the bag.

      • Arizona Don

        I still say whoever leaked or hacked those emails did America and Americans a public service. Kinda makes you wonder what went on in 8 and 12 doesn’t it?

        Any nations government that would accuse another nation of something like this without any proof does not have adults for leaders it has children or at the least the brains of children.

        Keep in mind it started over a year ago according to obama. Problem with that is it didn’t make any difference until obama found out hillary lost. I wonder why that was if it really was Russia.

    • Defend America

      If you read the full article it said that the tactics used are in consistent with what Russians used before in order to influence.

      It still has no concrete evidence it was Russia, just possiblity.

      Liberals want us to except the fact that Hillary was innocent because she was not prosecuted, even when all evidence says she was guilty. Yet they have no concrete evidence against Russia and we are to accept the fact that they are guilty. I do not think so. Just another liberals way of twisting the facts to suit your agenda.

      • gotabgood

        Once you buy the snake oil it is hard to admit you were fooled… but the longer you keep defending it.. the bigger fool you become.
        Not just prosecuted… not even arrested… no day in court..
        You have to stop reading National Esquire for your news…

        • Defend America

          To begin with I do not read the national enquirer. Second I got my information from watching C- Span. Listening to what Comey said. Listening to the inquiry between Comey and Trey Gowdy.

          Even Comey said if it were anyone other than Hillary that they were investigating they would have lost their credentials and had some form of punishment.

          Liberals just refuse to admit the truth. If you heard otherwise then you must be the one who gets his information from the national enquirer are possibly from a Looney Tunes magazine.

          • gotabgood

            Then you have selective hearing… because I also listened to Comey and Gowdy… was there errors made yes… the first error was for Republicans to cut the security budget as they are planning on doing AGAIN… maybe this time they can get 8 killed!!

            The bottom line of Gowdy and Comey were both the same… no wrong doing found. Or Gowdy said no evidence found…. Comey said No further investigation needed.. suggested not to prosecute..

            But you get all stuck in their findings and don’t listen to their recommendations…better known as the bottom line.

            And it is you, that refuse to accept the truth….examples

            57 repeals ObamaCare

            2 times to the SCOTUS

            12 Benghazi investigations

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LnkZ7Drk9s
            We could go on clear back to Starr… ( who now things the world of Bill Clinton)
            http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/25/us/politics/ken-starr-impeachment-bill-clinton.html?_r=0

            So who refuses to accept the truth????????????????????????????

        • Defend America

          Since I do not see my earlier response to you I will respond again.

          To begin with I do not read the national enquirer. I get my information from C- Span. I watched James Comey announce how Hillary was extremely careless with her emails. As he explained each and every detail of her actions the whole world knew she was guilty as sin. Then Comey dropped the bomb no prosecution recommended for lack of intent. What a crock of BS.

          Then I watched the hearing between Comey and Trey Gowdey. Comey stating if anyone other than Hillary were being investigated they would have lost their credentials and suffered some form of punishment. What makes her better than anyone else? Nothing, period. Therefore she was guilty she just bought her way out of prosecution do to her power, which again is BS.

          I also watched as the news reported Loretta Lynch and Bill meeting privately on a plane while Hillary was still under investigation. Then Loretta claiming she made a mistake once caught and would go by whatever Comey recommended.
          A hint to Comey not to prosecute.

          I also watched as Obama announced on national TV while she was under investigation that he was endorsing her for President. That was a signal to Comey to not recommend an indictment also an attempt to influence the election.

          All of the above is true and factual, so if anyone has gotten their news from the national enquirer I must assume it was YOU. If Dems are going to lie and cover up FACTS and TRUTH at least do it where you can not be proven wrong then possibly someone besides another lying dem might believe you.

          • gotabgood

            Do you also believe the moon landing was a hoax?
            You are knee deep in conspiracy theories, I bet you listen to Alex Jones and Steve Bannon a lot too.
            It seems funny a lot of things you say can be found in the Enquirer, same exaggerations.

            You can be walking down the street and walk past a known gangster, and at that exact moment someone took your picture walking side by side with a gangster and that is suppose to be proof positive yo associate with gangsters.
            Was Hillary careless… everyone says so… did she do anything different than say Colin Powell? He had a private server too… It is a fact his name is NOT Clinton.. or other wise he would have been under investigation. Clinton’s have been under your microscope for decades…. and not once was there an arrest….. OJ Simson… George Zimmerman were guilty of murder. But the law set them free….. get over it!
            And besides.. you won…. rejoice…. and get the hell off Hillary’s back… she lost the election… she won the fake investigations… including the last one staged by Comey.
            Did they ever arrest that phony eye witness you came up with over Benghazi?

          • Defend America

            This will be my last response to you as I see you as most liberals twist facts and deny, so no need in trying to have a civil conversation with those who refuse to see the TRUTH.

            1. Most of America myself included felt that OJ Simpson was guilty. If I am not mistaking he got off because of careless handling of the crime scene by the law.

            2. George Zimmerman case I was unable to follow so I can not respond.

            3. We will never get off of Hillary’s back until she is brought to justice are dead.
            She is a criminal no matter what your twisted mind says. She is a pathological
            LIAR. She sells out our country to foreign countries with her pay to play schemes. She brainwashes liberals. She kills innocent babies. She placed our national security and military in danger with her emails. I could go on and on.

          • gotabgood

            The things you accuse Hillary of were fabricated stories and justice was served… it was just not to your liking..

            here is one made up story rebuked,

            Russian to Judgment
            Allegations
            of a “quid pro quo” deal giving Russia ownership of one-fifth of U.S.
            uranium deposits in exchange for $145 million in donations to the
            Clinton Foundation are unsubstantiated.

            Unproven

            Example: [Collected via e-mail, 2016]

            January 2016: (This is typical of rightwing “proof” FACEBOOK!)

            This was on Facebook: “As Secretary of State, Hilary transferred half
            of U.S. uranium to Russia and received $145 million donation to Clinton
            Foundation.”

            March 2016:

            This is posted on Facebook. “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
            transferred 20% of US uranium to Putin’s Russia as 9 investors in the
            deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.” Is this a true
            fact? Thanks.
            http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

    • maxx

      Would that be the same 17 intelligence agencies that said they could not even find Hildabeasts emails?

      • charles17121

        Must it be said once again , The US Intelligence Agencies are part of the ILLEGAL obama administration and as such should not be expected to tell the truth . The US Government and our Constitutional Republic was overthrown January 20, 2009 !

        • maxx

          It was even earlier than that I’m afraid. Congress has been working for themselves and their wallets and not we the people since back in the 1960’s when they joined the “social justice” movement the democRats were following. The democRats stole a tactic from the Communist Party of America using propaganda and lies to demonize their opponents and it worked very well. Norman M Thomas, who was a 6 time communist candidate for president stopped running because he himself stated that “the democrat party has adopted our agenda”. Very little legislation has been passed since those days that was for the direct benefit of the American people. Most legislation has been to punish, tax or reduce our freedoms and liberties. The First and Second Amendments have been under constant attack all that while and although not abolished both have been badly weakened surreptitiously but political correctness.

      • Arizona Don

        I have heard many times that all 17 agencies agreed it was a Russian hack. Problem is I have never heard who the 17 agencies are. But even more important why is there 17 agencies doing the same job with the same responsibilities? We have the CIA and the FBI. We need 15 more? Doesn’t say much for them now does it?

        • maxx

          Ah, you have hit on the problem with most of the alphabet agencies created by Congress. They are populated with unelected bureaucrats and government civil service lackeys beholden to the members of Congress who illegally abdicated their authority to these people. Cronyism and nepotism abound and is very prevalent in these agencies. It’s how they pay their donors off. Not as glamorous as ambassadorships but many times they are extremely well paying lifetime government jobs with incredible benefit packages. Every single agency created since the 1950’s should be reviewed and abolished if it is unnecessary or not cost effective. Some like the EPA, FDA and IRS are downright dangerous to the publics well being.

      • gotabgood

        I guess you will have to refresh my memory with some facts…. National Enquirer doesn’t count as news

  • supergun

    What is the deal about hacking e-mails that will expose the corruption? Why do they continue to protect their e-mails that expose their corruption.

    • curmudgeon VN Veteran

      Trying to save further embarrassment. These are children pretending to be adults.

      • rfrichey

        Let’s clarify that statement, These are adults with the mentality of children.

        • Michael Dennewitz

          You insult children. These assholes were born without brains!?

          • supergun

            You are right. These assholes are international terrorists.

        • supergun

          More like the mentality of the WALKING DEAD.

      • supergun

        Children don’t act this damn stupid.

        • oldobxguy

          Their children do!

          • supergun

            Stupid parents fault.

    • thereasonableman

      Ask Putin and Assange- they have the RNC hacks too, just chose to target dems- or maybe Putin didn’t give them to Assange yet

      • supergun

        I am sure they do. Everyone has skeletons in their closets. Some just have more.

        • thereasonableman

          Gives me a warm fuzzy feeling knowing that the former KGB guy likes DJT. And if Assange ever out lives his usefulness he’ll die from some strange radiation sickness.

  • SouthernPatriot

    It is sad that the people under Hillary were that stupid and careless with important, even classified information. i asked my grandson, if he was looking for a password what would he try first. He quickly rattled off three choices he would start with and “password” was one of those. My grandson is 14 years of age. He is not a genius, just good with computers with which he grew up. The demented Democrat Hillary put our nation’s classified information at great risk. There was no need for Russians who are far more adept at breaking into computers than my 14 year old grandson, to break into the Podesta-Hillary computers, it was presented on a gift platter to anyone who wanted access.

    I sure hope the new AG Sessions impanels a grand jury or turns over the matter to a special prosecutor and goes after the criminal Hillary, and the Clinton Fraud Foundation.

    • maxx

      Clinton and her entire staff of gophers and campaign workers were a team of misfit liberal incompetents just like their leader.

      • george briar

        come on your giving them too much credit but they sure are a hoot.

    • jimmy midnight

      This notorious hard-core lefty sho’nuff agrees w/U about the “Stupid and careless,” part. As 4 attempts 2 prosecute the Clintons, I guess I’ll just wish U good luck.

      What the Clinton people did 2 the Bernie people is as close as they came 2 criminality, and it wasn’t actually illegal, just very ugly. In the USA we don’t prosecute anybody 4 doing things that weren’t illegal at the time. It’s called, ‘Ex post facto,” and our Constitution explicitly forbids that. “4 better or 4 worser,”

      • oldobxguy

        Jimmy, HRC as SOS committed many criminal offenses and if you don’t understand what she did then you should consider yourself the CEO of the “Stupid and Clueless” “notorious hard-core left”.

        • jimmy midnight

          Richard Nixon was a superhyperpowerful political figure. He had numerous powerful political enemies. Eventually, though he was never actually subjected 2 impeachment proceedings, he was forced 2 resign.

          Bill Clinton was actually, though unsuccessfully, impeached. Hillary’s also an extremely powerful figure, with powerful enemies as numerous as the stars. Nothing worse than a marathon congressional grilling has happened 2 her.

          I think the difference, in view of facts that Nixon and Bill both actually suffered consequences, while she didn’t, is that there’s no criminal, or adulterous, predicate.

          • oldobxguy

            Sounds like typical Leftist “Change direction of conversation” to me. What happened by or to Nixon or Bill Clinton has nothing to do with HRC’s crimes which are well known and well reported. BTW no precedent needed to indict and prosecute anyone for a crime but with BHO still in office with his ability to pardon it’s best to wait until we have an honest AG running the DOJ.

          • jimmy midnight

            Previous post wasn’t an attempt 2 distract, but merely 2 point out that even powerful people will, eventually, B brought 2 justice IF they’ve actually misbehaved. Secretary Clinton hasn’t even been indicted 4 anything, which is consistent wit the notion that she didn’t DO anything.

            Now that she’s no longer a threat 2 become President…

          • Joseph C Moore USN Ret

            “to” and “for” Grow up, child.

        • thereasonableman

          Not even the Republican Benghazi investigation could find anything indictable.

          • Joseph C Moore USN Ret

            False!

      • Tom F

        Actually, collusion between the DNC and a campaign staff IS supposed to be illegal, but don’t hold your breath waiting for Loretta Lynch to say anything about it.

        • thereasonableman

          Or Jeff Sessions- but I’m still waiting for someone to show me a citation to the US Code to show that it was criminal. There will be plenty of opportunities ti investigate unethical and possibly illegal conflicts of interest over the next 4 years. Just start with the DJT family.

        • jimmy midnight

          Not so sure on that one, and, anyway, they’re ALL doing it.

      • Joseph C Moore USN Ret

        Learn to construct sentences like an educated adult, not like an immature teen.

        • jimmy midnight

          I’m totally capable of following formal prose rules, but have adopted a modified style 4 spaces like this.

    • Peter Osborne

      Years ago my business used a computer , very early in there use in a small business, and we used Administrator as the password to the Administrator duties, but it had no contact with anything outside the office….. Once we connected to a telephone link , everything changed….

    • Gerald A. Reason

      Who knows, maybe some of them really did not want to see her in the White House, after they got to know her on a personal basis and found all that she had really done. I am not saying that this is the case BUT, there was that guy from the DNC who had help in leaving this world dead, who was thought to be one of the DNC’s leaks (fi what we read is true).

  • charles17121

    The US Intelligent Agency? which is part of the Illegal obama administration now saying they are sure it was the Russians hacking that cause Donald Trump to win the 2016 presidential election . I hope Donald Trump has his DOJ go after this fraud and usurper barack hussein obama tooth and nail . Just because this fraud and usurper barack hussein obama will be out of office does not mean he can’t be prosecuted for his fraud .

    • David in MA

      He can still be impeached and lose all pay and benefits, maybe this is why he is lining his pockets.

      • will

        Now that be would nice – this coming from a GWS vet who was tossed to the street to die. His mother in law got a pension for baby sitting while in office – 150k a year – I pray each day for iriony and that a ISIS obama imported rabid dog somehow blows his brains out. A national holiday for sure.

        • thereasonableman

          The GWS vets mother in law got a 150k pension for baby sitting? Oh, maybe you are writing about the previous post. Hard to tell from your writing style, better get a Harbrace Handbook.

          As for David in MA: can’t impeach if out of office- better hurry!

    • Michael Dennewitz

      The US Intel Agency forgets which hand to use to wipe their asses, that’s why they call the HNIC to find out!! ???

      • thereasonableman

        HNIC? Why don’t you write that out so that those who don’t know can evaluate the depth of your character?

    • Joseph C Moore USN Ret

      Exposing THE TRUTH about the machinations of the democrat morons helped Trump? How about, their evil and inept emails being exposed showed the public what devious dolts they were (and are). The onus is on them and not the messenger (Assange), nor Russia.

      • maxx

        It seems that there is no limit to Clintons raw stupidity. It seems she believed if her server was located in her bedroom closet or anywhere else in her house behind locked doors that it was secure. Well she was correct about one thing. The mechanical device was secure but the wide open national networks her alleged IT expert chose to use was not. Even a high school kid would have known that.

        • Tom F

          You know, Comey’s comments DID indicate that he thought her too stupid to know she was committing crimes – just maybe, her comment about “wiping with a cloth” WAS serious!

    • will

      We will have to puts tons of pressure on Trump to get a prosecution. The panels of poison ivy league spit spouters will tell him American history and prestige are more important than getting a conviction and justice. Thats because those poison ivy league garbage are complicit criminals as well

      • maxx

        Absolutely. More important to unlock Oblowhards records to get the truth of what he is hiding than to waste time on Clintons emails. Go after Obama for the fraud of the century and her for the deaths of Ambassador Stevens and his security team members. Those are real crimes.

      • thereasonableman

        The ones that went to ivy league schools like Penn?

    • SouthernPatriot

      Obama is having a wall built around his post-People’s house home to protect his family. Isn’t that rich? Building a wall around his home, but never using a dime of the allocated billions in Homeland Security to even start building a wall to help protect all Americans!!!?

      • thereasonableman

        You keep thinking money was appropriated for DHS to build the wall- it never happened- the money was never appropriated by any congress, dem or repub. Call your favorite repub congress person and ask them

  • Mark Brickey

    Password?!? And these were/are supposedly our “best”? Or at least, the best Dems can come up with?
    Are these guys so stupid or are they so arrogant that they’d think that no one would bother their computers?

    • BeijaFlor

      My guess is … Arrogant.

      • Mark Brickey

        😉

        • Arizona Don

          I think I’ll stick with stupid or perhaps imbecilic would be better.

    • Arizona Don

      Just looking at who the last two candidates have been and if that is the best they can do their in big trouble!

      • Mark Brickey

        Yeah, hopefully, they keep their heads in dark places & keep nominating their “quality leaders” !

  • curmudgeon VN Veteran

    Since the average democRAT or liberal democRAT has the maturity of a 14 year old this probably comes as a surprise. They should have tried harder and they could have hacked their own club.

    • Arizona Don

      Have you ever known a democrat who fits the dictionary definition of liberal? They call themselves that but it is not true.

      • curmudgeon VN Veteran

        No, they all peg the stupid meter. They are the most intolerant people walking the face of the earth.

  • rfrichey

    For all of you morons who can’t get it through your thick skulls, it’s over, you lost because you were stupid. Now, at this point, what difference does it make.

  • oinklesam

    But Trump thinks Assange should be arrested? Maybe TRUMP needs to do some re-thinking!

    • Defend America

      I never read that Can you post where you heard that? Thanks.

      • Arizona Don

        I never did either and I have seen most if not all the comments on it. It seems to me he did all Americans a public service. However, that does not get him off the hook for anything he may have done earlier. According to what Julian Assange told Sean Hannity it is a trumped (no pun intended) up charge. The women who were supposedly abused did not bring the charges. Sounds a little vindictive to me. But no one knows the full story except him and the women I guess.

        • maxx

          Nor did I and I do a lot of reading and researching.

          • Arizona Don

            Yea me too.

    • Joseph C Moore USN Ret

      I agree.

  • Barbara Harmon

    At what point is this silliness – and word twisting — and lie hiding under the premise of something else – and stupidity going to stop. This article says it right – if whoever did the hacking did it to shed light on the TRUTH, why not praise them (heck, if they were open to hacking due to carelessness on their systems they were almost asking for it to happen anyway!) and take it for what it is worth – it exposed a bad thing and the vulnerability of a sloppily made protection system, and be darned glad they did. At some point, if it were in the real world and not the political world of the dems, a harrassment suit would be slapped on them for blaming their own sins and frailities on someone else! Whiners and sore losers – that’s what they all are – as well as corrupt politicians. Sorry, this is my point of view and I am sticking to it.

    • oldobxguy

      Hey Barbara, when you’re right you’re right! I hope you and every other loyal American keep shouting the truth and just maybe some of the actual hard of hearing and low information voters on the left will get the message. Of course this is probably just wishful thinking on my part because I really believe that a large segment of Democratic voters know right from wrong but unknowingly support Evil because of misguided loyalties and lies heard so often, from the Left/MSM, they’ve come to believe as fact.

  • RsGoat

    Trump won because he worked hard and the public watched working hard while Hillary was lounging around. He even went to places our media had booby trapped for him with their “Trump is racist” narrative. He stood in front of crowds of people to suffer in front of them but still put out his message then ask for their vote many times. No outside influence effected this election. Our own turn coat media ignores the 60 minutes tape where he tells the camera and racist slobs to “Stop It” when it comes to ignorant violence. They do their level best to make sure our new President will fail at any turn having pushed the “Never Trump story” to the last minute and now this farce and what ever the next one will be. Our Democrat Media working for the reinstallation of the superior Party just will not be stopped until they drag down the duly elected President of our United States of America, are we not proud?

    • Michael Dennewitz

      The dumbasscrat liberals will always “invent” stories to steer the public away from the bullshit havoc they’re producing!! That’s dumbasscrats for you! ???

    • will

      Many reasons why he won. For me I wanted a president who understands we the people are his boss. If i wanted to live under a Queen I would go to England and parrish with the brits

    • maxx

      I believe if anybody was “responsible” for Clintons loss it was the MSM. They were so blatantly biased and did not even attempt to hide it that many people who were not Republican could not accept all the lies and chicanery the media was doing. Trump himself exposed the corruption within the GOP which brought a lot more soft Republicans to the voting booths. Now if those same people will turn out for the local and state elections and work to remove the Rino’s in 2018 the conservative agenda will be on it’s way to fix our government. Congress is still a den of thieves as long as a single Rino is allowed to exist. Every state needs to work very hard to get rid of the Rinos starting right now. Start searching now for qualified conservative candidates that will run against the Rinos in every primary.

  • will

    John McCain going senile. The Russian hack ia a act of war. Ok John how many acts of war have we committed against Russia in the last 5 years. Sure am glad Putin is not in your mental basket or we would be glowing about now. We both hack its part of the game. However if Putin can supply us with solid information that will lead to the arrest and conviction of Hilary, and bin Obama then we will remove some big sanctions. Help us jail Lorreta I need Lynched and we will pay money $$$$.

    • thereasonableman

      None of your wishes will come true because there is no evidence of criminal wrong-doing- politically stupid, maybe, but not criminal. And McCain will still be chairman of Sen ASC 5 yrs from now when DJT is who knows where, but he won’t be POTUS.

  • will

    From what I understand Obama will go down in History for two great accomplisments than all the other presidents combined.
    1 More debt as the first 43 only hit 10 trillion and by 1/20/17 he will top that
    2 he has also received more death threats than the first 43 combined
    I wonder why

    • SouthernPatriot

      Obama also made history by being unanimously slapped down more times by the Supreme Court (even its most leftist justices!) than any other POTUS. Even when he is gone, the U.S. Supreme Court will declare at least several more of his “executive orders” and regulations as “exceeding his authority” and in violation of the U.S. Immigration law and the U.S. Separation of Powers Act.

      • thereasonableman

        Ah! A student of SCOTUS jurisprudence. Citations to cases or some other legal authority would be appreciated to support your undocumented opinion. If you knew anything about law you would know that DJT can undo all of any Ex Orders from BHO or GWB on day one-but he won’t and as to regulations, Congess delegates the authority, they need to do a better job of bill drafting. And I can’t find any Separation of Powers Act that has passed both chambers of Congress.

    • rfrichey

      The death threats doesn’t surprise me. I think they were just threats, as all who wished him dead really hoped no one would waste a bullet on him as it would have caused more race problems than he has caused during his presidency.

      • oldobxguy

        You are absolutely correct, the folks who are physically violent and would actually do something like that come from the Left and Prisons are full of those folks. IMHO 99.9% of all violent confrontation and criminal acts are perpetrated by those that are Politically Left. Let me be clear about “violent confrontation”. It’s the Left who sets it in motion and the right (Police or Private Citizen) who will counter with legitimate defensive violence of their own.

        • Tom F

          Even worse, we would have had creepy Joe Biden as POTUS! I always thought of him as O’s “Insurance” policy. Just as I thought the same of “Creepy Clown” Kaine.

        • thereasonableman

          Oh, right, like the nut case in Chas, SC who murdered the folks in the church- a real lefty, confederate flag and all!

    • thereasonableman

      1. Republican Congresses gave him the money, including the $350B for Israel.
      2. Because he’s Afro-American. Just look @ the Trumpers giving the Nazi salute.

  • I WAS IN A CHINESE RESTUARANT LAST NIGHT. MY FORTUNE COOKIE HAD A HILLARY EMAIL IN IT.

    • SouthernPatriot

      That is funny!

      My fortunes always say the same thing, “Share your happiness with others today.”
      And I try my best to do that!

  • TPS12

    msm, hollywood, soros and many more tried to influence the elections with money and lies giving hilly the questions. When do we look into that, and how about we look at all the foreign money going to the clinton foundation and how it was spent? And why has china gotten a free pass on all the hacking they do?

    • RsGoat

      I wish I could have voted twice on that point, It is so obvious I do believe it is worth spreading. Soros HAS a history of interfering in countries. Thanks

  • Ed

    My vote against Hillary and for Trump was not because of anything hacked by anybody. It all came straight from her mouth. Her telling thousands of coal miners she would wage a war on coal and fossil fuels, causing people to lose their jobs, calling millions of Americans “deplorables” because they were Trump supporters, her stated (numerous times) war on the 2nd Amendment, her continuation and expansion of Obamacare, her wanting to allow anybody and everybody unfettered access to America, including terrorists, her appointment of at least one Leftist justice to the Supreme Court and possibly up to a total of 3 during her term of office. That would have made it a leftist court for decades thus making the politicized Judicial Branch an arm of the Executive Branch as anything a Liberal future president would want to do would be either approved by the court or legislated from the bench as the court has done, illegally, with Obamacare (declaring a fine a tax, any new taxes fall under the purview of Congress) and, out of thin air, no precedent in the Constitution, defining marriage which is now being cited as law, None of this was hacked information, it came straight from Hillary herself. I really don’t think anything hacked was influential to Hillary losing the vote. The hacked information was stuff the Democrats wanted kept from the public because it made them look much, much worse than they already are, if that is possible but really have no effect. So, flailing back they decided to shoot the messenger without one shred of concrete proof the Russians did the hacking. James Clapper, the confirmed leftist head of the CIA, says Russia did the hacking, Really? would you take the word of outgoing Leftist Clapper, who is supporting the Democrat effort on something like this, hasn’t presented any proof and using his title as authority to make the claim? Hillary did herself in 100 %. She didn’t need help, she did OK without it. And, those are some of the reasons I voted for Trump. A Hillary presidency was too horrible to contemplate.

  • CAPS IS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED. THE PARTY OF DEATH TO LITTLE CHILDREN HATES CATHOLICS.

    A LEAK FROM WIKILEAKS COVERING JOHN PODESTA’S EMAILS CRITICIZED RUPERT MURDOCK FOR RAISING HIS CHILDREN CATHOLIC. IT WENT ON TO SAY ALL CATHOLICS ARE PHONYS. THAT IS PAR FOR THE COMMUNIST COURSE, IT WAS NEVER HEADLINES ON NOTHING BUT COMMUNISTS NBC OR THE COMMUNIST NUT NETWORK CNN OR ALWAYS BE COMMUNIST ABC. WITH NPR ON FLUTE.SNL FAILED TO MAKE LIGHT OF IT UNDER THE COMMUNIST COMEDY UMBRELLA.

    HERE IN TRUMP TOWN WE CALL THAT A COVER UP. JUST LIKE BENGHAZI. JUST LIKE THE 2,000 GI’S UNDER OBAMA THE LOSER WHOSE BODIES WERE SMUGGLED BACK FROM AFGHANISTAN DISGUISED IN THE MEDIA AS NATO TROOPS. NOT TO MENTION THE 20,000 WOUNDED. MANY WEARING PROSTHESIS. BUSH LOST 461 IN AFGHANISTAN. THE COMMUNISTS WILL SAY BUSH LOST 4700 IN IRAQ AND FATHER TOM SAYS OBAMA LOST 500,000 IN IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN AND SYRIA IF YOU COUNT CIVILIANS. OBAMA LOST WHOLE COUNTRIES AND FUNDED IRANIAN TERRORISM AND SENT CAPTURED HEZBOLLAH AND AL QUEDA BACK TO KILL MORE AMERICANS

    SO THE MORAL OF THE STORY THAT AMERICAN’S MUST TAKE TO HEART IS GET OUT OF THE PARTY OF DEATH. IT IS NO PLACE FOR GOD LOVING PEOPLE. IT IS OK FOR WORMS LIKE GEORGE SOROS THE ATHEIST AND HIS ILK. YOU CAN’T CALL YOURSELF A PERSON OF GOD AND KILL HIS CREATION ON THE BATTLEFIELD OR IN THE WOMB. WHAT YOU DO TO THE LEAST OF MY PEOPLE YOU DO UNTO ME. WHERE DID I HEAR THAT BEFORE?

    DELIVER US FROM THE EVIL DEMO COMMOS EL TRUMPO. VIVA CHRISTO REY.

    ASS CARTER GAVE HIM A MEDAL. HE FORGOT TO GIVE HIM THE TOILET PAPER HAT. OBAMA GAVE OUT MEDALS TO HIS AIDS. IF I WAS A CMH RECEPIENT BEFORE I WOULD LET THE SERPENT TIE IT AROUND MY NECK. I WOULD SAY JUST HAND ME IT IN THE BOX. COULD YOU HAVE SOMEONE ELSE HAND IT TO ME? HE TIED A MEDAL AROUND BRUCE SPITSTEIN’S NECK. BRUCE HAS A SONG THAT THE COMMUNISTS CALL PATRIOTIC. BORN IN THE USA. NO ONE EVER SINGS THE SECOND VERSE. YOU ARE GOING TO LOVE THIS VERSE IF YOU ARE A NAM VET. ARE YOU READY. IS THE PISTOL BACK IN THE SAFE? SENT TO NAM TO KILL THE YELLOW MAN. IS THAT WHY YOU WENT TO NAM ? TO KILL THE YELLOW MAN?
    WAS SOUTH VIETNAM ALL WHITE? WAS SOUTH KOREA ALL WHITE? WERE THE VIETNAMESE BOAT PEOPLE ALL WHITE. HOW ABOUT THE MONG PEOPLE THE DEMOCRATS LEFT TO DIE. HOW ABOUT OUR POW’S? JOHN MCCAIN SAID THERE WERE NON LEFT BEHIND. BS STANDS FOR MORE THAN BRUCE SPRINGSTEIN THE SINGING COMMUNIST. EVERY BODY SING BORN IN THE COMMUNIST VC.

    DIZZYWORLD PRESENTS THE MICKEY MOUSE MCCAIN HEARINGS. and his side kick Pluto played by Cardin the Demo commo flag burner. (it’s freedom of speech you know.) Cardin voted to burn the flag as a Viet con grease mouse. That is how you get to be senator in the party of death to little children. McCain led the circus by directing the questions and leading the witnesses. Two out of three were retiring in a month. Right after the king is crowned. Watch the commies go nuts over that line. So it was the SOS. I can’t tell you how many victories we have had because that is top secret. There is no boogie man under my bed mommy. Right out of the box all the bad acts are coming to the front. The Rino rats that include Lindseed Graham Cracker, John McCain who fought drug transpotation thru Arizona for 30 years. Now known as the UPS of the Heroin state. Way to go John. Paul Rino and Match McConeel who reached across the aisle to join 40 Demo Commo Senators and voted to burn the flag forty days before 911. I remember that day seeing pregnant moms diving out of 80 story windows covered up by the Clinton Press.
    Hilary shouted what did Bush Know and when did he know it? Bin Laden came twice. The Clinton’s gave him a pass twice. Once when the Sudanese Government offered to hand Bin Laden over and the clear shot day when Bin Laden was falconing in the Hindu Kush. All covered up by the communist media. You are not using that passe word Liberal anymore are you? CCCant you say CCComunist? Don’t be afraid to be labeled a McCarthyite by the communists. The KGB confirmed McCarthy was right. THESE HEARINGS PROVE OVER AND OVER THAT OUR INTEL SUCKS. I do not need an NBC media charade to confirm Obama has made all government agencies obselete. Now appearing on the apprentice for the last time the CIA or CYA. The FBI or the FIB. Are you going to miss the IRS,EPA,BLM and add your favorite here? Hold all the Academy award hearings you want boys up until Jan 20th. Then comes the new store hours. 4:00 AM to midnight. As for the CIA when you have an Irish moslem in charge we be foo ked. God save the Trump.So what have now says the fine old woman? Eight years of child murder 10,000,000 babies chopped to pieces and sold for spare parts. Ten trillion dollars added to the national debt plus 98 million in junkets to Hawaii the democrat state. Times up on January the 20th. Let the Trump pets sound Hail to the chief. Let us extend a hand of friendship to the destroyers of the nation.More Whine anybody? Can’t be a bible person and a demon crat. Run Christians Run!

    SPIRIT OF AMERICA PARTY

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07ZB3piJBYo&feature=em-share_video_user IRS ABRACADABRA

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/spiritofamericapartybook/2016/12/30/tweet-with-twump

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wirX86U7ORk SAVE THE KIDS

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0eN277Doz8 AMERICAN CROSS ROADS

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGthgVd3i0E&t=134s flag burners of record

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPp4vlUQ6gw&feature=em-share_video_user I PLEDGE TO THEE BOYCOTT NBC

    • oldobxguy

      Agree with your sentiments with one exception, your comment “YOU CAN’T CALL YOURSELF A PERSON OF GOD AND KILL HIS CREATION ON THE BATTLEFIELD OR IN THE WOMB”. That statement is only half true. see link:https://www.gotquestions.org/killing-in-war.html

  • WHEN DID THE INTEL COMMUNITY LEARN MADAM LA FARCE HAD AN OPEN SERVER IN THE BARN?

  • tCotUS

    DNC e-mail Security handled by Hillary ..What can they expect ????

  • kassa1

    It does not make any difference Hillary Clinton went against football coach she think she’s above the law and used unsecured servers, and the arrogance of the Democrat party reflects that

  • george briar

    Wow never thought of using the word password as my password . And you morons wanted these idiots to take over where Obama left off? Wonder what Hillary’s password was? Lets see I know “Huma” or maybe “President Hillary” yeah that’s it. The democrats are stupid period. Mean while the 3 Clintons have been secretly planning their escape from this country before Donald gets sworn in. Wonder where they will go? I know Orgy Island certainly not Benghazi or maybe Kenya as Obama can protect them there after all they still have his original birth certificate.

  • george briar

    Gee wiz I can’t help but wonder why the Russians didn’t hack Bernie sanders computer. they probably knew there would be less in there than in his head. The democrats run a criminal and a commy for President that in itself spells lose. Even two time loser crazy Joe Biden would have been a better choice plus he’s not allowed to have a computer according to Obama that was concerned about him watching too much kiddy porn.

    • thereasonableman

      George, where do you get these wacky ideas of yours? Maybe you should go investigate Cosmic Pizza, maybe your buddy missed something.

  • Theresa Petruzzi

    Hillary lost the election on her own. She thought it was her turn, and just wanted to hang with the rich and famous and could not relate to the middle class ( deplorables) I think it was still an inside job, look how many people either went missing, Or shot that worked for her. Not to mention she and obama ” misplaced” millions of out $. Now they will blame republicans because they used $ for SS etc. what happened to Russia being Hillary’s friend? What happened to the uranium deal she made with them.? Lots of $ from taxpayers taken from the Dems. Sickening!

  • Theresa Petruzzi

    Different rules for the democrats. Americans r sick of politicians and ” don’t tell Americans who to vote for” a big No! no!

  • Susan

    We have two weeks – it is a long time – especially with the likes of Hillary and Barack…there is plenty of time to do something diabolical yet – and don’t think they aren’t working on it… martial law (so someone doesn’t have to leave office)? Just an example – remember – it isn’t over til the fat lady sings – and she isn’t singing yet 🙂

  • river

    Well now wait a minute here, that’s not fair…. Kill-Larry couldn’t have gotten the emails…. she lost 33,000 of them.

  • Lorraine E

    Without any proof the democrats keep blaming Russia for Wiki Leaks of podesta’s email. And even though they have no proof, because lies can’t be proven, under the direction of the appointed president they continue to repeat the lies about Russia. Their belief is that if you tell a lie often enough, the sheeple will believe it.
    They are still trying to use the lie they created about Russia to destroy the credibility of the election results and prevent Donald Trump from becoming our next president.
    Attacking the Russians for something they didn’t do is also a diversion from the irrefutable contents of the emails and the diversion appears to be working. Their vile comrades in the lying corporate media join them in their never ending lies about Russia and don’t mention the contents of the emails.
    They must think that the American people are all very stupid and aren’t able to recognize what they are doing.

    • thereasonableman

      Read National Review article positing 3 reasons Assange would lie concerning his source (the Russians).
      Intel agency chiefs all agree it was the Russians and since they will all be out of work in 12 days have no reason to lie.

  • Donald N. Mei

    Assange is a goddam traitor and Putin would destroy us if he could. Think Ukraine and Aleppo! What the hell is going on here?

  • tCotUS

    DNC should have put Hillary in charge of the Server Security….There wouldn’t be anything to Hack…

  • Tom F

    It’s even worse! As “Southern Patriot” points out below, no one had to “hack” the DNC servers to get Podesta’s emails – someone sent him a very generic phishing email saying he should change his password – and “Click Here” to do it. So he did!
    But worse than that, we have all these “Smart People” running around talking about how someone “hacked” the DNC to get Podesta’s emails – but they WEREN’T THERE! Podesta was using a GMAIL account, so all his emails and account information were (probably still are) stored in the Google cloud, not at the DNC nor the campaign’s computers. So it really sounds like all those “Smart” intelligence agencies, and certainly those “smart” media types, are showing off how little they understand about how email works, how little they are willing to do their research, and, basically – how STUPID they are!! And, if THOSE are the people in charge of our “Intelligence Agencies,” people, WE ARE IN DEEP DOO-DOO!!

  • thereasonableman

    National Review ( the William F Buckley magazine) recently published an article positing three reasons why Assange would lie about his source. We should all read the article before believing Assange.

  • Bob666

    The fact is; Wikileaks has stated publicly that Assange can’t guaranty that Russia did not furnish the emails. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/90416aa5e2d0d4143ca2419df1dea34aae5b41751f2b4ed040f8579c7247d711.jpg

  • Jake

    So what if we were hacked and by who, the information was correct and corrupting. The source is not the problem the content is. Lock her up.

    • Bob666

      So, what you’re sayiig is; You’re quite fine with another country medeling with our election comrade Jake? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/97d60e5df86f18d3f34506744a476a4a477b0c13f58ee01739ed556557f22d9c.jpg

      • Jake

        What I’m saying, Bob, is that as always you liberals are sidetracking the important issue here. If the hacking had an effect on the election at least the electorate had the benefit of knowing the true corruption in the Clinton campaign.

        • Arizona Don

          Do you ever wonder what these false big news items like Russia hacking the DNC are meant to cover. They use words like assess they do not use words like proven or proof or positive. Instead they assess (evaluate or estimate does not constitute proof of any sort) the accusation and determine it could be true even without proof. Do these obama democrats think we are so stupid we cannot see through their charade?

          Then we find out things like; Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Tuesday made the bombshell claim that he has “confirmed evidence” (constituting proof) that U.S.-led coalition forces provided support to terrorist groups in Syria, “including ISIS.” And we hear words like proof and confirmed evidence when speaking of what this obama administration has done in the world.

          There is just absolutely no doubt about the corruption in the world. Problem is much of it comes from our own president obama! Risking being redundant, if Russia is responsible for the information exposed by Wikileaks, I would like very much to know what information was released by Russia to Wikileaks that was “false.” Was it written as propaganda by the Russians. Who originated the harmful information. Was/is there any actual proof it came from Russia and if so what was it? It is time for some real truth here. If in fact there is no false information in that which was made public whoever released it deserves considerable thanks. Seems to me they did a public service.

          We the people of these United States of America have been lied to, mislead and taken advantage of for eight years now by the current administration. Some, if not most, of the so called progressive communistic democrats seem to think they can continue to deceive us. How can any people conclude the lies coming out of the DNC and other democrat organizations could even possibly be true? It is so obviously false.

          We as Americans set here and expect our government, the president. Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and other high level cabinet members within the current obama administration to do the right thing and we are and have been disappointed every time. I look forward to the Trump administration. I look forward to being proud of this once great nation again. I look forward to being able to trust our elected representatives again. I look forward to America being Great once more!

        • Bob666

          So, What I’m saying, Jake, is that as always you Dull ultra right wing nut cases are sidetracking the important issue here. Hacking had an effect on the election at least the election & you had the benefit of knowing the true corruption of only the Clinton campaign.

          Putin has the dirt on Trump for blackmail.

          FYI-Not a Democrat Jake!
          https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4e1e33ada7e02ca778e8ebb5f5478e5411b0a44995f7bf0e478dd00fe8efa8b2.jpg

        • Arizona Don

          I refuse to waste my time on such an idiot as bob666. .

      • Arizona Don

        So the question here is since obama has lied constantly for eight years now. In total it could be said the obama administration has been the most untrustworthy, deceitful, corrupted administration in the history of America. Hillary was a part of that untrustworthy, deceitful, corrupted administration. But we should believe them now right?

        On the other hand in over a decade Julian Assange has not released one item that has been proven to be false. Not even one. He has been truthful from day one all the way back to 2005. But you see it more logical to believe known liars then someone who has never even been questioned regarding the authenticity of what he releases. Even though no one, not even one person from all those supposed seventeen agencies has provided any evidence or proof of any kind and they say they have assessed (you may want to look up the definition of that word) the accusation to be truth without proof. Typical progressive communistic democrat reasoning. Have a nice day.

        • Bob666

          So the answer is:
          “On the other hand in over a decade Julian Assange has not released one item that has been proven to be false. Not even one”
          You know this how Don? Did you personally review in excess of a million documents that Wekileaks has released?

          If you look at real news sources, there were multiple releases of the same emails with altered content-so that blows a hole in your statement.

          “But you see it more logical to believe known liars then someone who has never even been questioned regarding the authenticity of what he releases”?

          Was that an actual question or just mad rambling?

          ” Even though no one, not even one person from all those “supposed” seventeen agencies has provided any evidence or proof of any kind and they say they have assessed (you may want to look up the definition of that word) the accusation to be truth without proof”.

          First, there are in fact, 17 national intelligence agencies & the FBI for a total of 18 independent agencies. Finally, You & I do not get to see the briefing that 100 senators have seen and it would appear to be total buy in from 100% of them from Both parties. I have read the redacted intelligence summary and having grown up in the cold war as the son of a military intelligence officer, have no problem believing the possibility of what they claim.

          “Typical progressive communistic democrat reasoning”.

          That’s what just sucked the last bit of wind out of your sails Don since I was a GOP delegate from Florida who helped nominate Ronald Reagan in Michigan on July 17, 1980. That was before the republican party was bought and sold by special interest.

          Congratulations Don, You’re an idiot!
          Have a nice day.”
          https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ea84c14f1cc52f166f7af46841f4be2b38c6a5fb0b440ff06b4e81e8321fd947.jpg

        • Bob666
  • annefarrelly

    Just because Russia and other hacked the Dems computers, does not mean the Russians gave the emails to Wikileaks. They probably just wanted them to blackmail Hillary if she got elected. Why would they possibly want Trump in the White House? They thought Hillary would win and therefore wanted the goods on her for later use. I believe a disgrunted Dem employee was pissed because of the way the election was rigged against Bernie Sanders and decided to give the emails to Wikileaks.

  • AL

    When talking about those fools spell it right demoKKKrats for that is what they all are. Also PRAY the burning cross falls and sends them all to be with the party leader SATAN.

  • Dannie Poe

    No matter who hacked Hillary’s emails the fact remains that government business was done on private service email accounts. This is why the government has protected email services for government business. This is why Hillary broke the law PERIOD. It is so easy to blame the hackers as it refocuses the blame elsewhere. Had Hillary not been The Secretary of States people would be behind bars as I type, including Hillary. It is also clear that because Hillary is considered Political Correct she will most likely go free and not be held accountable. This scandal happened on Obama’s watch. Just one of the many failures and scandals of Obama’s Presidency.

  • gnikt

    EVERYTHING would have been OK for 0’bama IF Hellary won the presidency.
    0’bama will let it go without doing anything – this shows how good a president is this party organizer.




Newsletter Subscription

2014 UnfilteredPatriot.com
Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com