Transition Pledge: Trump Already Draining the Swamp

GOOD THINKING……..I HAVE BLOCKED 4 DIFFERENT ONES SO FAR………

Screaming as usual.

You have the audacity to mention “liberty and justice for all”, after Hillary was given a pass for mishandling classified information only because she was too powerful to indict. To answer your question, “Liberty Agenda” is everything that Obama did during the last eight years. I am sure that when Trump leaves office, you will fully understand what the “Conservative Agenda” was.

I really do not know what your grandmother and mother being suffragettes have to do with the conversation, but I am glad that they were highly educated professionals.
I also lived in the Civil Rights era, but I did not march with Dr. King; however, blacks were treated horribly and thankfully the Civil Rights era changed that for the better.
As far as Hillary’s email scandal, even Comey said that she was extremely carless in handling classified information, including Top Secret. It does not matter that the emails were not marked, as the sender would have had to type the classification on the top and bottom of each page. THAT was obviously not done, but that error does NOT mean that the information was not classified. The bottom line is that, if Hillary had not attempted to be so NON-TRANSPARENT, she would not have cause such a scandal. However, as corporations are too big to fail, Hillary has proven that she is too powerful to indict.
When I was stationed in the National Military Command Center in the Pentagon, I had a SI (one step above Top Secret) clearance. I had had been “carless” in handling classified information, it would have been the end of my career and at a minimum, I would have received Office Hours. Hillary gets off and she was running for president, so where is the justice?

You bet, all “operating room personnel” have TS clearances, right? Does it take a TS security clearance to operate on someone? I thought about it and just don’t get your point. Why don’t you just come out and say what you mean.

Who is bragging about “security clearances”, as I just stated a FACT. Don’t try to make something dark out of it. And, what I could tell some officers about THEIR wives, especially Navy wives.

“The Hillary scandal is pure cow manure.” You keep telling yourself that, if it makes you feel all warm and fuzzy. However, I am surprised that a person with your education and experience would take the mishandling of classified information so lightly.

So, if doctors have security clearances, and you are one of them, why do you take mishandling classified information so lightly. Or, worse yet, refuse to believe that Hillary mishandled classified information, regardless of what Comey said in the FBI’s report.

So, everybody that sent or received emails form Hillary over her private server had to know that the server was not a secure government “machine”. You are probably right, but it appears that those people, including Hillary, obviously did not care. Or, are you saying that since they new it was not secure, it was okay to send classified information over that email system?

Mail sent to he was nor properly identified as classified,. When are you Hillary supporter going to get over this “it wasn’t marked as classified” thing and realize that that excuse does not hold water. The fact that it was not marked as classified does not mean that the information contained therein is in fact NOT classified. If that was the case, anyone could send emails containing TS information and just NOT mark it at the top and bottom, and they would be home free. Even Comey said in his report that a person in Hillary’s position should be able to identify information that should be classified. End of argument!

Now, just how many people do you think the DOJ should have charged? Answer: As many as compromised or mishandled classified information should be held accountable and disciplined. Why would ask such a question? Are you saying that, if enough people rob banks, we should not arrest any of them?
NO, I do NOT agree that charging hundreds of people for mishandling classified information would have made America the laughing stock of the world. The fact that NOTHING happened to Hillary is what made us look like laughing stock of the world. I really can not understand your position considering your education and experience. You are basically saying that Hillary did NOTHING wrong, but if she did, we should overlook it, as a lot of other people used her email system and server. If you still had a security clearance, you should be reported and your clearance pulled. Nothing personal, just good security.

Funny that YOU still have your security clearance, and my was terminated when I no longer needed access to certain classified information. But, what do I know?

Who are the “inexperienced people” you referred to?

“No, what I am saying is INTENT is not present.” You apparently did not keep up with the progress of the FBI investigation. The stature under which Comey said the FBI had investigated Hillary was: 18 U.S.C. section 793(f), which requires ONLY a showing of “gross negligence”, NOT intent, in mis-handling classified materials.
“In essence, in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote the statute (noted above), inserting an intent element that Congress DID NOT require. The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a statute that criminalizes GROSS NEGLIGENCE is to underscore that government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to GROSS NEGLIGENCE, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing. The lack of INTENT to harm our country is IRRELEVANT. People never INTEND the bad things that happen due to GROSS NEGLIGENCE.”

I agree full heartedly with your first comment, a BOTH parties should be held accountable for their illegal actions and charged accordingly. However, you referring to this violation of this statue as a “witch hunt” simply reflected that you do not care about the safeguarding of classified material, and I must admit that I a shocked at such a statement coming from you. That being said, ensuring that are classified information is safeguarded and punishing those that violate this trust is NEVER a waste of money. But, when did the liberals EVER worry about wasting taxpayers money?

“The FBI investigations found two (2) “questionable” e-mails out of thousands.” I really do not know where you liberals get your information, as you have apparently been “asleep at the switch”.

Comey’s quotes from his report on the Hillary’s investigation:

Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.

Notice the “…making it a felony to mishandle classified information either INTENTIONALLY or IN A GROSSLY NEGLIGENT WAY…”.

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification.

Which of these 110 emails are the “two (2) questionable e-mails” that YOU referred to?

OMG, why am I not surprised that, like a good liberal, you deny, deflect and keep trying to use the same old worn out excuses for Hillary’s actions. Your excuses are so lame that I won’t even try to address them. Have a good one.

What does being a surgeon, living in Alaska and being 10 minutes from a hospital have to do with a security clearance? A security clearance is based on a “need to know” basis, and I don’t see how what you state reflects that “need to know”.

I’m sorry, but I don’t understand how all of this justifies a security clearance based on your “need to know”.

You’re arguing with a village idiot who has no clue what personality she’s talking to. She is NOT who she says she is, never has been. She’s not allowed to comment on a blog unless she’s wearing her Hannibal Lectre mask. Even then she/he dances around her basement pit arguing with “it” to Areosmith CDs.

Forgive me, but “misguided” might be an understatement. If you’ve talked to her many times I’m sure you have not mistaken the many personalities, professions, and out right delusions that she imposes here. She’s a troll, an instigator and nobody knows what personality they’ll be talking to from day to day.

I would love to come up to Alaska and spend some time with you, but my schedule just won’t allow it, as I am so busy working at being retired. But, thank for the invite.
Oh, now you are pulling my chain to get me started on insurance companies. I was a medical biller for two medical practices after I retired, and I understand insurance and insurance companies well. While some insurances companies have been accused of “fraud”, it is more accurate to call their day to day actions simply “questionable actions”, bordering on the unethical at times. As a doctor, you know that insurance companies will do just about anything to NOT pay a claim, even when THEY are the ones that establish acceptable charges, usually based on Medicare payments.
I called insurance companies on a daily basis concerning pending claims over 30 day old. I got all kinds of answers like, We didn’t receive the claim, The procedure codes were not in accordance with the diagnosis code, You used the wrong code (but we will not tell you what the right code is), We need additional supporting documentation (but never told me this until I called), Give us another week or so to process the claim, if you do not hear from us, give us a call, and on and on. While I questioned their practices, I did not see any outward signs of “fraud”.
I have seen a number of fraud cases here in Las Vegas where the providers were involved. These cases usually involved “up-coding” and submitting claims for services or procedures that were NOT performed. One doctor ran a colonoscopy mill and claimed that he could conduct a colonoscopy in 10 minutes. He was found to be using the same needle and double doses out of a single dose vile. I think it was 12 of his patients contracted hepatitis and one dies. His biller was inflating his procedure time and made a deal with prosecutors to avoid prison time. The colonoscopy center was shut down, the Dr. and an assistant were tried for 2nd degree murder, found guilty and will spend a number of years in prison, but I can’t remember exactly how many.

Oh puhlese, don’t waste your emotions on me. I feel great making you demonstrate how miserable and ignorant that you really are. You cant even fake being sane. Here you are on a conservative blog, time and time again, flapping your gums like you know anything other than how to be ignorant of your delusional self. Be my guest, Lizzy Borden. It’s obvious that you cant even associate sanely with the liberal dingbats.

Well then AKTardo2015 if you learned anything you would be smart enough to just shad up and go away…. be gone toilet bug.

Sounds like you’re attracted to abuse, AKToiletBug2015. I got an idea, why not smear some pizza all over your miserable self and go outside… see if you can attract a grizzly. Be gone Troll.

I dunno, akTardLardy2015, seems I’m doing quite well with it, and you understand I don’t need your shallow opinion? Which means as a subordinate to my skill you should sit down and shad up!

Reality is in the numbers.

Let me revise my question: How many do you think the U.S. Government has the funds to investigate, charge and bring to trial?
We are talking thousands of documents potentially involving thousands of people.

In several recent cases police shootings have been deemed unnecessary. It is not just a white v. black issue. While the numbers for innocent MINORITY convictions are much higher, it also happens to whites.
Suggest you visit The Innocence Project. http://www.innocenceproject.org/

Make that visit today. It is an education everyone should be forced to obtain.

Money is not the problem?
Money is not an issue?
You sound like the Congress that passed a tax reduction at the same time they authorized two unecessary wars.

America spends more on its military than all the other modern, industrialized countries combined — including Russia and China.

The U.S. is the only modern. indistrialied country that allows people to die — simply because they cannot afford to buy medical care.
Is that something you are proud of? I am not.

I am an advocate for the disabled. Over 95% of my clients became disabled because they did not have enough funds to pay for medical care. By the time they qualified for Medicaid, it was too late, they had reached th point where they were on the verge of becoming homeless and permanently too disabled to work. By the time they come knocking on my door, many are homeless.

They are referred to me by the welfare office. You see, I don’t charge for my services. I’m not an attorney. Alaska law allows me to essentially practice law wirhout a license at agency level.

Even at that stage, they were still having to fight tooth and nail just to eat, let alone keep their homes. Once upon a time, they had jobs and bank accounts and health insurance …. All it take is one serous injury or one seeious illnes. or that of a spouse, or child …

Mini Federal Accounting Course:

1. National debt is cumulative.

2. Deficit spending is what Congress has done.

Mini Constitutional Law Course:

1. A Prwsident can veto a spending bill.

2. The Constitution permits Congress to over-ride a Presidential veto.

Sarcasm yours and mine.
The point being, Obama did not increase the debt.

That is not how it works.
You are former military you know better.
The federal fiscal year is Oct. 1 throught Sept. 30. A President takes office almost four months into a fiscal year.

You are former military, an officer no less — you know better.

Many bills, especially those for the Defense Department, are multi-year,

There are several out there that are valid through 2020 and beyond.

You should have been around to see the fiscal end spending that went on at the Milwaukee Veterans Hospital back in the 1980s.

Patients did not have robes, needed slippers and the head honcho redecorated his office to the tune of $2 million.

The year-end frenzy at Veterans was the worst I ever witnessed since my “employment” with government began in the 1980s.
The money was being transferred from one agency office to another, across 4 states.

I’ve worked for a number of government agencies.
The Veterans Administration was the most wasteful of them all.

Mini History Class:

French Revolution caused by poverty.

Russian Revolution caused by poverty.

Chinese Revolution caused by poverty.

American Revolution caused by poverty (skip book pages back to why people came here).

Oh, I am a proponent of wealth distribution — just not to China, Vietnam, Korea, India …

Buy American, put Americans to work.

If you cannot buy American, then be ready to support your fellow Americans who’s jobs you are giving away, or have already given away.

Don’t blame unions.
You choose to buy foreign made products. No one forces you to do so.

It began just after WW II with the import of cheap Japanese made goods. They were cheap in every way, quality and price.

When Daddy Walton was alive, Wal-Mart sold only American-made goods. When he died, the children put profits ahead of their fellow Americans.

I lived in the Oklahoma and South Carolina in those days.
The OKC Wal-Mart gave us one year of free cat food because we adopted the kitten of a cashier they had awarded a college scholorshop to.

America now worships the God Profit with Greed.

Benefits are wages psid for work performed — , nothing more, nothing less.

Benefits provide the employee with accesss to volume discounts., nothing more, nothin less.

Benefits are not gifts.
They never have been.
They have monetary value. They are non-cash wages.
There is no such thing as “free health insurance”.
Employers compete in the labor market.

Social Security and Medicare are not the only employment-related taxes an employer must pay.

One example are the state and federal unemployment taxes.

Benefits are tax free wages for thw employee.

They are tax deductions for the employer.

The employee does not even get credit towards their SS Retiremnt.

You might want to look at the history of employment in Japan.
It is not pretty to look at. If you think U.S. unions are bad, you are in for a major eye opener.

You forgot to mention the lifetime ermployment model.

It is also xommon for employees to work 12 to 14 hours a day, six days a week.
How would you feel about working 40+ hours over overtime, every week, without pay?

Low borth rates are changing the employment norms. The government has begun to get involved as a result of the birth rate.

You also left out the markedly competative education system.

In that era. one could buy a puld of ham for $0.10.

Facts are meaningless out of context.

My first job paid $20.00 a week. I was the nanny, housekeeper, maid. cook…

for a family of five. In summer I worked 24/7. In winter, I took time to attend school. I was up about 4:00 AM eveey morning and not in bed before 10 PM.

The summers before I took tjat job, I spent with relatives on a farm. I loved Concord Grape season I probably ate alost as many as I picked.

My parents were physicians, career military. I’ve lived a lot of places. I’ve held a lot of jobs.

Don’t blame the unions. Surly you have to be kidding. Why do you thing that union membership is declining year after year?
Look at what happened to Hostess Brands, a company that WANTED to remain in the U.S.. They filled for bankruptcy in Jan, 2012 and entered negotiation with the union that representing 6,600 of their employees. The company proposed a reduction in wages and benefits, and they would continue to fund its’ pension plans. The employees rejected the proposal by 92% in Nov, 2012 and went on strike. On Nov 16, 2012, Hostess announced that it was ceasing its plant operations and laying off most of its 18,500 employees. End result: 18,500 employees not only had their pay and benefits reduced, but, in fact, LOST THEIR JOBS – NO PAY AND NO BENEFITS. In addition they LOST THEIR PENSIONS. Great move by the union that cost their members their jobs. The kicker: How many union leaders lost THEIR jobs. Answer: NONE! Blame unions? You bet?

Foreign competition? “On January 10, 2012, Hostess Brands filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy for the second time. IN ITS FILING, the company said it “is not competitive, primarily due to legacy pension and medical benefit obligations and restrictive work rules””.

You must have confused the Old HB (prior to 2013) aka Hostess Brands (post 2013). On March 12, Apollo and Metropoulos won the bid to buy the brands from Hostess for $410 million. The Old HB that filled for bankruptcy, ceased operations/distributions and laid off 18,500 employees no longer exists. And, the new company said that they would NOT rehire any of the union employees.

Ah, yes, 2012 is old business, as union supporters even want you to forget what happen yesterday, IF is undermines their attempt to get more members AND, yes, more DUES. The fact remains that the actions of the union representing 6,600 union employees (refusing concessions and going on strike) resulted in 18,500 people losing their jobs. That included 11,900 NON-UNION employees. I am sure that these employees were really ready to join the union, after the union cost them their jobs.

Unions are comprised of “union bosses” and the dues paying members. Unions are ripe for graft and corruption. Why do you think the mob liked the unions in Chicago. Was it because they were so law abiding?
Unions are “invited”, if enough employees vote to invite them in.

I am very well aware of the innocence project and the good work that they do. Yes, it is a fact that innocent people go to prison and some even get the death penalty. Hopefully, DNA will help correct this miscarriage of justice.
The problem I have is that during the last eight years, the white officer shooting a black seems to get all of the attention, and the white officer is automatically guilty. Of course, Holder (Lynch) launched an investigation to determined if the “victim’s” rights were violated. Look at Baltimore where the city officials were black and even went on TV to tell the world WHY they were guilty within days of the event. After all was said and done, the end result was: two officer found not guilty, one hung jury and the charged dropped on the other three officers. However, when a black officer shoots another black or a white person, it does not even make the newspaper. Do you agree with this picture?

I really do not know how to address your comment, as it appears that you only see the negative things in life. Maybe in your mind, your comments are accurate, but I refuse to think that our world and society has become so full of hate and discrimination that a black can not get a fair trial. I will admit that poor blacks do not get the same justice as rich people get, but that is also true of poor whites too. This is not due to skin color, but rather, due to our screwed up judicial system where lawyers via for a “win”, regardless of the accused guilt or innocence.
You are right that DNA testing is expensive, when an accused is trying to prove his/her innocence, but it IS free when police use DNA to eliminate a suspect or prove that a person is guilty.

You are absolutely correct that I have NOT seen or lived through the events you reference; however, that was 40 to 50 years ago, different place and different times. u are trying to make me feel guilty, forget it, as I had no control over events that took place 50 years, or more, ago. How long are YOU going to live in the past and feel ashamed over things that YOU had no control over? Did I ever say that I agreed to the way blacks were treated 50 or more years ago? NO, I have not, but how long will people like you and other liberals blame me and whites like me for what went on a half century ago. That is ridiculous!
Just how many years do we have to go through before blacks feel that they are treated equally and that the police are not their enemy? That is the real question, as whites can not answer it. Only blacks have the opportunity to change how they are looked upon and treated, as to continue to do the same thing and expecting different results will NOT hack it.

1841 Cincinnati-white mobs riot against black dock workers using a cannon, destroying property & killing an unknown number.

1824 Providence- white mobs attack blacks for refusing to get off sidewalk; destroy 20 buildings in black district.

1863 Detroit-after a sensationalist rape trial white mobs riot, beating and killing blacks and burning down some 35 buildings.

1866 New Orleans- whites attack black political parade outside the Mechanics Institute in New Orleans; 38 killed and 46 wounded.

Flash: It is 2016, NOT 1866! So, what is your point?

Flash: It is 2016, NOT 1868. So, what is your point?

And yet, you are extremely critical of Trump for reading Hitler. Wonders never cease.

I guess that you condone “guilt by association”, but regardless, Trump WILL BE our next president. As the liberals loved to say when Obama was elected, “Live with it”.

Do you REALLY think that there is even a chance that Trump will not be our next president? If so, I hope that you wake up in time to see the results on Jan 6.

What does the fact that Bush beat Gore OR Trump beat Hillary have to do with the future, other than Democrats will keep losing to the Republicans?

So, Gore won the popular vote, so he has earned a lollipop.

Flash: It is 2016, NOT 1870! So, what is your point?

That from a woman who is extremely critical of Trump for reading Hitler. Go figure.

My point is that one should read the works of all authors, good and bad, so that the same mistakes are not repeated and to build on the good point. I learned that from an AKLady.

The case alleged that the Trump Management Corporation had discriminated against blacks who wished to rent apartments in Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island. The government charged the corporation with quoting different rental terms and conditions to blacks and whites and lying to blacks that apartments were not available, according to reports of the lawsuit.

Trump responded in characteristic fashion — holding a press conference to call the charges “absolutely ridiculous.” He told the New York Times: “We never have discriminated and we never would. There have been a number of local actions against us and we’ve won them all. We were charged with discrimination and we proved in court that we did not discriminate.”

He later took the uncommon step of suing the Justice Department for defamation, seeking $100 million in damages. His lawyer was Roy Cohn, the infamous former Joseph McCarthy aide, who was known for his hard-ball tactics.

Next?

What he was alleged to have done is nothing when compared to what Hillary has done.

Problem is that Trump is a Fascist.
He is also second generation KKK.
He is a legally documneted racist. He has been sued by the DOJ over 179 times, starting in 1973..

Hillary has not illegally done business with Communist Cuba.

Hillary has never been formally charged with any crime.

She has never been sued by the DOJ for racial discrimination.

She is not tied to an international terrorist organization. The KKK is now listed as just that.

Hillary has been accuses of many things, but she has never been formally charged.

She has not been sued over 4,000 time. She is not currently involved in over 75 law suits.

Trump has done all those things. So what is Hillary, you tell me.

Why people keep repeating the same false stories, over and over…

Benghazi is about as foul a lie as they get. General Carter Ham offered Stevens more military security. Stevens turned down offers — not once, but twice.

Hide e-mails? Never mind it was Hillary’s staff, not Hillary that deleted those emails — long before any subpoena was issued. What does fact and truth matter.. Which story are you going to believe? Trump’s or the facts provided by her staff?

Uncle Sam’s computers get hacked on an almost daily basis. Many of them are old. IBM mainframes, and I mean old. The Cray at Naval Underwater Sound has been around since the 1980s.

Nothing to help during the attack?
Just what do you think cold have been done?
Should the U.S. have bombed a city full of innocents?
There was no “stand down order”.
There were two seperate sites attacked in Benghazi.
There were attacks in two widely seperated location in that country on that night — not just in Benghazi.

We are Americans, we do not kill hundreds, or more likely thousands for the crimes of a few terrorists. Well, unless you are President named Bush. He retsliated against millons of innocents, killung thousadns more Americans while he was at it.

There was no stand down order. That is a lie which has been repeated ad nauseam.

There is a lot of fiction out there.

Here is a good article on a reputable site.

I suggest you read it.

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/boehner-and-benghazi/

Flash: It is 2016, NOT 1870! So, what is your point.

Flash: It is 2016 NOT 1921! So, what is your point?

There is a minimum od two parties to every e-mail. Correct.

Everyone who sent improperly identfied mail to Clinton is just as guilty as she is. Correct, and they should also be indicted. Hillary’s excuse at one time was that none of the emails that she received or sent were “marked” as being classified. Of course not, as the person who was sending the classified info would have to TYPE the appropriated classification at the top and bottom of each page, unless the classified document was being scanned and then sent via email. Only an idiot would type the classification and then send the info over an unsecure email system. Of course we don’t really know what was included in the 30,000 emails that she deleted as personal.

Clinton’s e-mail address clearly advertised the fact that she was not using U.S. Government secure equipment. I would agree, but Obama would not, as it is been proven that he received emails from Hillary, and HE did not notice that she sent the email over a non-secure email system (address). Boy, those Democrats really know how to protect classified information, right?

Do you REALLY believe that Hillary and Obama NEVER included classified material over Hillary’s unsecure server? Come on, I know that you are smarter than that. Again, we do not know what was in those 30,000 emails that Hillary deleted in an attempt to be “transparent” (snicker).
So, if “all soaftwear (sic) allows the use of “stationary””, I guess Hillary and the people that she received emails from were not smart enough to use that “stationary”. Wouldn’t you agree?

I can not argue with what you say, but I do not think that we should make it as easy as possible for foreign countries to hack into our systems by sending sensitive (classified) information over unsecure systems. Of course, the United States is NOT trying to hack into countries like Russia’s and China’s computer systems, right?

That is true. Thank you. .

Cite the law, paragraph and chapter.
You don’t know jack about law — of any type.

It is indisputable that it was neither a crime nor even a violation of State Department procedure for Clinton to have used personal email for government business at that time.

18 U.S.C.A. § 1924(a), is a misdemeanor, however it does not apply.

18 U.S.C.A § 793(f) speaks only to ESPIONAGE. It has absolutely nothing to do with Hillary..

YOU ARE TERRIBLY MISINFORMED.

The law is the law. not your interpritation of it.

You have never read 18 U.S.C.A § 793(f)

Childish foul lamguage and name calling do not evidence either you legal abilty of adulthood.

Correct!

In my experience, that warning is printed at the same time the document is printed.

In the old days, we had all these different rubber stamps on our desks.
Now, pushing a button on a computer is all that is required.

She doesn’t have the clearance, education and intellect that she claims. Last week she was a rocket scientist assigned to putting fair global warming taxes on martians. Truth is, she’s lucky to have a degree as a fry cook at Burger King.

Here we go again with your ridiculous comments. No, the spouse of an individual does NOT have to pass the same “security check”. Why, because that spouse does not have a “need to know” which is the basis of issuing security checks in the first place. When I was assigned to the Pentagon, the FBI sent an agent to my home town to speak to my previous neighbors and my high school teachers. Not one question about my wife of eleven years who was from the same town and went to the same high school.
I think you put too much importance on being a surgeon, as related to security clearances. Security clearances are NOT issued based on the assumption that a person MAY be exposed to classified information. They are issued on a basis of “need to know”, and a surgeon certainly does NOT have a “need to know” when performing surgery.
I think that we have discussed Hillary’s email scandal enough, as all you have to do is read the FBI report to determined that she did in fact mishandle classified information. Of course, she was not indicted, as she WAS “too powerful to indict” and Obama would never have allowed her to be indicted. Lynch, who is a joke, just threw the decision back to the FBI by saying that she would accept their recommendation BEFORE that recommendation was make by Comey. The good thing is that we do not have to worry about Hillary anymore, as she is a dead issue.
If you think that Hillary’s computer system is “more secure than the government system”, so be it. However, at least the government tries to secure their systems, while Hillary made no such effort. Have I ever been hacked? NO, but I have never been the Secretary of State or ran for the presidency either. Have you?

I am sorry, but I do not know what you are trying to say.

Just how would anyone identify a single computer among how many in that neighborhood, city, countu, state?
Compute security is not rocket science. There is not any computer code that cannot be broken.

When you went to the Pentagon …

Gee, the loftiest place I ever worked was Naval Underwater Sound In Connecticut and DOD in Alaska.

Oh, that’s right, we tracked all the subs and their communications, especislly the Rusaaian ones; and monitored all those little things planted on the bottom of the ocean.
Having been at the Pentagone, you should hav some idea as to what DOD does in Alaska, well did back in the day …

Yeah, really….FOUR GOOD MEN DIED BECAUSE OF HER COW MANURE! GET REAL, IDIOT!!!

Are you living in this world, or have you stolen drugs from your ER? YOU ARE A DELUSIONAL FOOL!!!!!

General Carter Ham made two offers of addtional security to Stevens. Both were refused. There are many lies told. You choose what to believe. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/world/article24749134.html

Maybe you should look at the actual facts uncovered by the investigstion?
Oh, that is right, everyone who does not agree with your hate is stupid.

OMG! Three generations? I guess some people just don’t learn.

3 generations of female flaming liberals proves only that the multigenerational disease needs to treated from a padded cell. Those generations of child abuse should be horse whipped and dry gulched.

Yea, feminist types should not be allowed to vote since they are a minority of their own making. Women don’t like the feminist movement. It’s shrinking because it’s self engaged and frivolous, and let’s not leave out… man haters.

Thank you for your service.

In the end Hillary will not be given a pass for mishandling classified information. This is the AG’s job and not Trumps. The jailing of Hillary will lead to many more crooks in our Government . https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/61c00e3cb321c20e13d30670ad34d6119ee48724294516682405587ede01e529.png

No! It means Control over all who are not part of the global “elite”.

Bias is in the perception. Apparently, the majority do not agee with you.

“biased” press?

Fox is not now, nor has it ever been a “news” source. It is entertainment, pure and simpke. Frankly, Fox is a propaganda outlet.

I have no idea.
Why don’t you tell me?
I can’t tell you when the last time I watched the boob tube.

Fox was one of the reasons I quit watching TV.

Local news comes streight to my Mail Inbox.

With Internet, I have access to world-wide news.

Do you limit yourself to American news sources?

I missed that. What did he say about the leftist production of overpriced hip hop version of history?

Why do you say that?
The entire prodiction was a political statement.

Please go take your meds!!

Why after 8 years do you continue to repeat what youu must know is false?

Almost 70 years laer and shameful America is sill a racist country,
Jealous maybe?

Harvard Law honors graduate. Published author. State Senator, Now President of a country,

If he were not an American citizen, he would never have been nominated for President.
If he were not an American CItizen, he would never have been allowed to take office.

Get help before you harm yourself or others..